CREATORS – David Harris

Name: David Harris

Which came first in your life, the science or the art?

I think science came first but I was always using technology to artistic ends. It’s hard to say which came first because I think they both really kicked in when I was about seven years old, when I started building electronics and got my first computer. Formally, I focused first on science with my undergrad and PhD studies in theoretical physics but after spending 15 years or so as a science communicator and journalist, I’ve just moved to art fulltime and have just completed my Master of Fine Arts degree in Digital Arts and New Media.

Which sciences relate to your art practice?

I primarily draw on physical sciences but I don’t really make art ABOUT science, as such. It’s just that my background in science makes my life, and therefore my art, infused with science. So really, I have all kinds of science in what I do, but particularly the scientific process sitting behind it all. I’m also interested in critically questioning the processes of science and technology even though I’m a huge fan of what science enables in the world.

What do you use to create your artworks?

I don’t work in a fixed medium, although I tend to make a fair bit of embedded electronics new media art, typically involving light and sound. But some of my work is purely digital, and some of it is text-based and uses nothing more technological than pen and paper or rubber stamps.

Artwork/Exhibition you are most proud of:

At the moment “Edges of Color”, my MFA thesis piece, which has been loaned by the University of California, Santa Cruz, for the next year, is my favorite work. It is a study of what can be done with color light presentation, in contrast with color in print. It is built as a set of programmed pieces on a hardware platform with the whole process also commenting on the nature of creativity and innovation in a Silicon Valley environment where I currently live. It tries to situate itself in a lineage of color and light art and directly references the works of artists like Gerhard Richter, Damien Hirst, Jason Salavon, Jim Campbell, and others.

Is there anything else you want to tell us?

As I look back over my body of work, I find it hard to detect particularly consistent themes that emerge except that science clearly infuses what I make. It also seems that I like to make work that speaks to previous art and design but in an updated, contemporary way. I think one of the reasons why science art is often pushed aside by the conventional contemporary art world is that it often fails to connect with the deep history of art. That makes it easier to put neglected in a corner. That’s not to say we shouldn’t be doing innovative things in science art, it’s just that we need to be cognizant of what has gone before and understand what we do in historical terms as well as in creative terms.